Why VerifEye Beats SMS & Email MFA

A detailed comparison of cost, security, and user experience across MFA methods.

Cost Reduction

0 %

vs SMS & Email combined

Better Security

0 x

Real human proof, not device possession

Faster Experience

0 s

vs 30-60s for SMS/email codes

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

See exactly where VerifEye outperforms traditional MFA methods.

Feature	VerifEye MFA	SMS MFA	Email MFA
Cost & Economics
Cost per verification	≤$0.02	$0.01-$0.20 Varies by region	$0.001 Hidden costs in delivery
International cost	Same price	Up to $0.20+	Same
Annual cost at 1M verifications/month	$240,000	$600,000	$12,000 + support costs
Hidden costs	None	Support tickets Failed deliveries Lost conversions	Spam filtering Deliverability issues Account recovery
User Experience
Time to verify	<5 seconds	17-20 seconds	35-60 seconds
User steps required	1 step Look at camera	3-4 steps Wait, open message, copy code, paste	4-5 steps Switch app, find email, open, copy, paste
Device switching required	Not required	If on desktop	Often required
Estimated conversion drop-off	~5%	15-30%	20-35%
Works offline/no network	With stored credential
Security & Fraud Prevention
Verifies real human presence	Cryptographic proof	Device possession only	Account access only
Resistant to SIM swap attacks		Highly vulnerable
Resistant to phishing	Can't be forwarded	Code can be forwarded	Accounts compromised
Prevents duplicate accounts	Uniqueness check	Unlimited VoIP numbers	Unlimited free emails
Bot resistance	Definitive proof Liveness detection	Easily automated VoIP farms	Trivial to automate Disposable emails
Additional Capabilities
Age verification	Included
Continuous session verification	Passive background checks	One-time check only	One-time check only
Device-bound credential	Instant re-auth	SMS every time	Email every time

Real-World Impact: Meta Case Study

See how face verification outperforms traditional verification methods at the largest scale ever tested ^[1]

The Challenge

Meta faced a crisis: account takeovers were escalating despite SMS and email MFA. Attackers used SIM swapping and phishing to bypass traditional security. Meanwhile, legitimate users struggled with SMS delays and friction.

The Solution

Meta deployed video selfie verification for account recovery and high-risk actions. Users look at their camera for 2-3 seconds—the system confirms liveness and matches against profile photos.

Results in One Quarter

0 %

vs SMS & Email combined

0 %

Reduction in detected compromise on Instagram

0 M

Fraudulent accounts linked to scam centers removed

"Video selfie verification is fundamentally harder for attackers to abuse than document-based verification." [2]

— Meta Trust & Safety Team

Easy Migration from SMS/Email

No rip-and-replace. Add VerifEye alongside your existing MFA, then gradually shift users to the better experience.

Add as Option

Activate VerifEye in your IAM platform (Okta, Auth0, Microsoft Entra)—no coding required. Users choose between SMS, email, or VerifEye.

Test & Optimize

A/B test VerifEye vs SMS. Measure conversion rates, support tickets, and user satisfaction. You’ll see the difference immediately.

Make Default

Once validated, set VerifEye as the default MFA method. Keep SMS/email as fallbacks for edge cases.

Most customers see positive ROI within the first month after migration.

Ready to Move Beyond SMS?

Experience VerifEye yourself, or talk to our team about migrating from your current MFA solution.